Tuesday, August 12, 2025

Oprah Picks Russo's Bridge of Sighs, Hard vs Soft Science Fiction, Keeping Up With What Dan Read, Surprise First Edition Hobbit Found, Hamilton On the Big Screen, Queer Authors Withdraw From Consideration, Obit for Sallie Bingham, Of Flame and Fury by Mikayla Bridge, Lightlark and Nightbane by Alex Aster, and Mortal Arts by Anna Lee Huber

Welcome to nearly mid-August! That means we're even closer to fall, with lower temps and gray skies full of frost and the promise of cozy reading under blankets indoors, with spiced cider and purring cats. Perfection! Anyway, here's a whole lotta tidbits and my usual reviews...hang in there, fellow sun-haters! Summer's almost over!
 
I'm not sure why Oprah has been recommending mostly old white male authors (they really don't need the boost in sales like female or LGBTQ or POC authors do), but here she is going into Russo's backlist for a title that wasn't that popular over 20 years ago. Sigh. How can she be so out of touch with readers/publishers and marketers? 
 
Oprah's Book Club Pick: Bridge of Sighs
Oprah Winfrey turned back the clock and chose Richard Russo's 2007 novel
Bridge of Sighs (Vintage) as the August Oprah's Book Club Pick,
Oprah Daily reported, noting: "This book has everything you need for a
classic summer read--romance, unrequited love, lifelong friendships--and
of course epic family drama.... You all know I love a story that sweeps
you up, and this one is not going to disappoint."

"It is, of course, a profound honor to be chosen for Oprah's Book Club,"
said Russo. "But to be chosen for a novel written two decades earlier? A
book that will introduce a whole new generation of readers to my work?
How special is that?"
Oprah described Russo as "a master at capturing the ordinary moments
that reveal some of the deepest truths, especially in small-town
novels."

This is a definition that, as a veteran reader of SF, I've been asked to provide for the past 50 + years. Though I'm a fan of both, I never framed it as a Doctor Who vs Star Trek definition....not that that doesn't work, but I always felt that so called "soft" SF got a bad rap because it took on social questions and problems, such as racism, sexism and relationships and provided a futuristic look at what might happen if those questions were taken on during a journey on a spaceship (ala Marta Randall) or on another world (ala Ursula LeGuin) or on our own world, centuries in the future (ala Zenna Henderson and her People novels). The "hard" SF novels that I read were often good thriller-type books, but sometimes, as with Azimov or AC Clarke, the plot got bogged down in science info-dumps that were often really boring and tedious if you weren't a scientist yourself, as I wasn't. Still, I did love the imaginative creations of hard SF, like flying cars, and I'm glad that a lot of the tech on Star Trek's original series became reality within my lifetime.
 
Hard vs Soft Science Fiction, Defined
Hard and soft science fiction are terms you may have heard bandied about in talks about the genre. Both have their ardent fans who don’t really like the other. Sometimes, books straddle the line, causing some debate. But, what exactly is the difference between hard sci-fi and soft sci-fi?
In hard science fiction, the science is really important, central to the story, even. The science is accurate. It is well-researched and grounded in a futuristic view of proven science that exists in our world. Often, writers of hard sci-fi have a background in science and frequently put scientists as important characters in their books.
Soft science fiction, on the other hand, uses speculative elements to tell stories that focus on people. These can be deeply philosophical stories, religious stories, and literary stories about interpersonal relationships. Think Star Trek or Doctor Who, where the science is made up, and the speculative elements are really just there to tell very human stories. Warp drives are not based in real science. The TARDIS moves through time because it does.

They're acting like 80 books a year is a big deal. I read at least 120 (usually closer to 200) books a year and I review them on my blog. Even as a 4 year old in 1964, I read as many books as I could get my little hands on. (I figure at this point the count of books consumed over my lifetime would be well into the 100,000 range).  This Dan dude's got nothing on me!
He sounds like my kind of guy, though, and I think that giving out a list of the books you have read and loved at your funeral is a splendid and inspired idea.
 
Robert Gray: Keeping Up with 'What Dan Read'

I've always felt like an underachiever as a reader when measured by
volume. Twenty years ago, I confessed my slow reading habits in a blog
post about ARCs ("I'm Reading as Fast as I Can!!"), noting that although
I had increased my reading speed somewhat--out of professional
necessity--during the first 13 years I'd been a frontline bookseller, I
still felt like a biblio-laggard.

Strangely, though, "my customers think I'm a reading machine," I wrote
then. "They will sometimes ask, with unmasked awe, 'How many books do
you read per week?' It's as if they think I've become some kind of
Electrolux, devouring pages as fast as they come off the printing press.
The truth is more mundane.

"Often I have three, four, or five books going at once, and continue to
cast my eyes with hunger and longing at the endless stream of new and
tempting titles that come across my desk. And I often just graze,
reading 50 pages and bailing if I'm not fully engaged. Nevertheless, the
stack on my desk continues to grow at a pace that outstrips my ability
to keep up. I seem to look for reasons not to continue reading, reasons
to give myself a break and move on to the next title."

So it was with a long-gestating mixture of awe and humility that I
recently learned about the extraordinary reading life of Dan Pelzer, who
died at the age of 92 on July 1. He logged all 3,599 of the books he had
read since 1962, when "he first began jotting his reads down on his language class work sheets while stationed in Nepal with the Peace Corps, to 2023, when his eyesight failed him and he could no longer read," the New York Times reported.

Most of his books came from the Whitehall Branch of the Columbus, Ohio,
Metropolitan Library, which posted on Facebook a message from his
daughter, Marci Pelzer, who noted, in part: "Nobody loved the library
more than Dan.
When we were little, he took us to the downtown library every Saturday
morning and enrolled us in every summer reading program. He was a
regular at the Livingston and then Whitehall branches until he could no
longer read. I'm sure he would be among your highest circulation and
longest term borrowers."

She had considered printing his reading list to distribute at the
funeral, but it was too long and ultimately she asked her godson create
a website featuring What Dan Read, a digitiized version of the handwritten list that guests could access through a QR code on the back of the funeral program.

The library has since created book displays in his honor at the Whitehall Branch and at Main Library.

When I wrote that blog post mentioned above in 2005, I had just returned
home from BookExpo, where I had once again been showered with gifts in
the form of ARCs and "now, a new mound of guilt towers above me at this
desk. I did not grab them off stacks on a mad locust tour of the show
floor. These were nearly all given to me personally by publishers,
editors, or authors, who each time handed me the most precious gift they
had to give: their work, their life, their hope. I do not have a vested
interest in any of the titles that come my way until I read and love
them."

I asked myself then: "When will I read all these galleys? Can I read
them all? Will I read yours? Maybe, maybe not. But, rest assured that,
within the considerable limitations of my ability, time, and attention
span, I'll be reading as fast as I can."
I'm no Dan Pelzer though.--Robert Gray

WOW! I love it when a fellow bibliophile finds a book treasure in an unlikely place. My best friend once found a first edition Hemingway and a first printing of Moby Dick and made enough from their sale to keep her going for an entire year.
 
"Surprise!" Screamed the Shelf
As it chucked a rare and pristine copy of The Hobbit at your head. While this doesn’t exactly describe what rare books specialist Caitlin Riley experienced, she was no less astonished by the sight of such a gem amidst the detritus of an otherwise unremarkable house clean-out. The first-edition, first-impression copy of J.R.R. Tolkien’s classic appeared fresh from the presses, which is, as Bayliss Rare Books owner Oliver Bayliss told The New York Times , "As rare as Smaug’s treasure, frankly." Needless to say, it was the last thing Riley expected to see and it brought her to joyful tears. It might be that the owner knew C.S. Lewis and, through him, Tolkien. I’m as interested in the story of how this copy came into the possession of the Priestley family as I am about its current condition. Like, was it a ruefully accepted, regifted housewarming present from Lewis? The copy is currently at auction, so if you have £20,000 (as of writing this) to spare, you might be able to get your hands on this literary diamond and wonder at it in person.

How exciting! I would love to watch this amazing Tony Award winning smash hit on the big screen!
 
Your Chance to Watch Hamilton on the Big Screen
If, like me, you’ve only had the opportunity to watch Hamilton on the small screen, you’re in luck. The Broadway sensation is coming to theaters on September 5th. Hamilton creator Lin-Manuel Miranda announced that the "live capture" of the original cast production sent to streaming during the pandemic is finally making its way to the big screen in celebration of the play’s 10-year anniversary. Fans nationwide and in Puerto Rico will have the chance to watch this historic historical musical in the theater, so get that soundtrack ready and make sure you’ve got all the lines memorized so you don’t get left out when everyone in the audience starts singing along.
This is just sad...why anyone would align themselves with a known transphobic author who has caused so much controversy is beyond me.
Queer Writing Prize Sees Nominated Authors Withdraw From Consideration
Many authors nominated for The Polari Prize have withdrawn their name from consideration in protest of the inclusion of John Boyne among the nominees. Boyne has aligned himself publicly with JK Rowling’s unhinged transphobia. And in what should come as a surprise to absolutely no one, this is not really cool with a bunch of folks. Withdrawing your name from consideration is an underrated mode of resistance, perhaps especially within groups you might feel naturally aligned.
I love that this courageous journalist questioned prejudice and misogyny in the newspaper business and brought about the demise of the family empire due to their poor treatment of women and minorities. RIP Sallie.
Obituary Note: Sallie Bingham
Sallie Bingham the author, playwright, philanthropist, feminist, and political activist "whose feud with her brother helped topple the Kentucky publishing and media dynasty into which she was born," died August 6, the New York
Times reported. She was 88.

In 1918, her paternal grandfather, Robert Worth Bingham, bought the
Louisville Courier-Journal and the Louisville Times. The newspapers, run
next by her father, Barry Bingham Sr., "flourished in the decades that
followed. They won Pulitzer Prizes and became known for their liberal
political positions. But by the 1980s, the newspaper industry was in
financial trouble," the Times wrote.

Sallie Bingham had been living in New York City since graduating from
Radcliffe College in 1958. She published a novel, After Such Knowledge
(1960), and many short stories, but in 1977 she returned to Louisville,
hoping to advance her career as a playwright and improve family
relations. Her brother, Barry Bingham Jr., was by then running the
newspapers, and she attended board meetings for a few years before
joining the Courier-Journal's staff as book page editor in 1981.

"She soon began questioning the paper's treatment of its employees,
particularly women and members of minority groups, and publicly joined a
political committee, violating the company's ethics rules," the Times
wrote. Forced off the companies' boards in 1983 by her brother, she
eventually put her shares up for sale to the general public, a move that
ultimately led to the sale of the entire family business.

Her book Passion and Prejudice: A Family Memoir (1989) condemned the
Bingham family, and the system in which it operated, as immoral,
misogynist, and racist. Afterwards, Bingham returned to writing novels,
including Small Victories (1992), Matron of Honor (1996), and Taken by
the Shawnee (2024).

In 2024, she told the Santa Fe., N.M., arts magazine Pasatiempo she
would concentrate on historical fiction, noting: "After 30 years as a
writer, I've done all I can do in fiction. I'm kind of tired of my own
point of view." Two of her last books were nonfiction: The Silver Swan:
In Search of Doris Duke (2020) and the memoir Little Brother (2022),
about her brother Jonathan, who died in 1964 at the age of 21 after
being accidentally electrocuted.
On her blog, Bingham cited her time at the newspaper as inspiration to
create the foundation: "I was aware from my years as book editor at the
Courier-Journal of the amount of work that women did at the Bingham
companies; almost entirely in lower-paid jobs such as distributing mail,
cooking and serving in the company cafeteria, working as secretaries or
cleaning. These women were about to lose their jobs with the sale of the
company."


Of Flame and Fury by Mikayla Bridge is a beautifully produced novel with a gorgeous cover and painted edge papers that use phoenixes in place of dragons to create a YA romantasy that is different than Fourth Wing, but still stuffed to the gills with the same old tropes as all the romantasy written in the past 10 years of so. Here's the blurb: 
Fourth Wing meets Iron Widow in this enemies-to-lovers romantic fantasy by debut author Mikayla Bridge. 
On an island built from ash and shrouded in fire, phoenix racing is a sport just as profitable as it is deadly.

Kel Varra and her team of underdogs, the Crimson Howlers, are desperate to win the annual races and the fortune that comes with it. But the Howlers need a new rider, which leads Kel to join forces with Warren “Coup” Coupers – an arrogant rival she can’t get out of her head.

As tensions rise on and off the track, Kel accepts a job from a mysterious tech mogul who shows an unsettling interest in her phoenix, Savita. This thrusts Kel into a conspiracy that endangers everyone she cares about, especially Coup, as her resentment ignites into something dangerously new.

Heart-pounding pages full of fiery romance, jaw-dropping confessions, political scheming, and volatile magic culminate in a final battle that none may survive.
 
What really bothers me about YA/Teen romantasy is that the guy half of the couple is nearly always an asshole, so much so that you want to see him dead before the book is half done. He abuses the female protagonist and everyone around her, but because he has a tragic backstory, once she learns he's "damaged" all is forgiven and suddenly she can't help herself from falling in love/lust with his bad boy good looks and style, though he is still a jerk. Why? Why must the young women in these books all hate themselves and yet feel compelled to "rescue and rehabilitate" their rival male protagonists, when the guy rarely changes much and is not really worth it. Of course he makes it clear that he's up for hate sex at any time, but why should these otherwise smart and talented young women settle for just another sexist jerk who wants to get in their pants?!? Kel should have let Coup be hung on his own petard, as the saying goes, and had some faith in herself as a rider and member of the Howlers. The prose was surprisingly fine for a first time author, but the plot lagged in spots, and, as I've said, it was riddled with cliches and tropes throughout. I'd give this book a B-, and recommend it to those who don't want to think too much while reading summer romantasies.
 
Lightlark by Alex Aster is another YA romantasy, complete with a Hunger Games-esque plot and Game of Thrones-like characters. Here's the blurb: A gripping, propulsive YA fantasy novel from award-winning author and social media superstar Alex Aster, “Lightlark is an ebullient, fast-paced fantasy with a beautifully rendered world that seethes with intrigue, romance and tension. I couldn't turn the pages fast enough” ( Sabaa Tahir)

Welcome to the Centennial.

Every hundred years, the island of Lightlark appears for only 100 days to host a deadly game, where the rulers of six realms fight to break their curses and win unparalleled power. Each ruler has something to hide. Each curse is uniquely wicked. To break them—and save themselves and their realms—one ruler must die.

To survive, Isla Crown must lie, cheat, and betray. Even as love complicates everything.

Because I purchased both the first and second books in this series, I wasn't too put out by the cliffhangery ending. The prose was engrossing and the plot of the first book sizzled along like an egg on an August afternoon sidewalk. I liked Isla, up until she started to be dumbed down with lust for the villain Grim, who, like Edward from Twilight, was sexy somehow because he felt and looked like a corpse, with hard, marble-like muscles, cold shadows and a vicious outlook on life and everyone except, in the final third of the book, Isla, whose winsome innocence and starving body full of scars suddenly became irresistible to him. Again, I don't understand why these young women suddenly lost all sense and mental acuity because they fall in love with the ruthless and evil male protagonist who, in this case, as tried to kill her several times...wow, now that is sexy, being the target of a serial killer! (Sarcasm). Anyway, I'd give the first book in the series a B, and recommend it to the Twilight crowd of YA readers, and those who like the completely derivative Fourth Wing.
 
Nightbane by Alex Aster is the second book in this YA romantasy series (I assume that there is, unfortunately, more of this melodramatic claptrap out there), wherein Isla, who has become involved with the King and now fears Grim, whom she unwittingly married, and has to choose between the two as to whom to save and whom to kill. Sigh. How romantic(?) Here's the blurb: Isla Crown has secured the love of two powerful rulers and broken the curses that plagued the six realms for centuries, but few know the true origins of her powers.

Now, in the wake of a crushing betrayal, Isla finds herself struggling to win respect as the newly crowned leader of two separate realms. Worse, her fellow rulers haven’t ceded victory quietly, and there are others in Isla’s midst who don’t believe her ascent to power was earned.

As certain death races toward Lightlark and secrets from the past begin to unravel, Isla must weigh her responsibility to her people against the whims of the most dangerous traitor of all: her heart.

Alex Aster’s intricate world expands after the riveting culmination of the Centennial games, delving more deeply into Isla’s memories of her past, as her future hurtles toward two possible fates.
 
As per usual in these "dark" romantasies, the female protagonist, Isla, gets beat up and scarred and bloodied in her quest for whatever magical macguffin will help her save her world and the people in it. Sadly, the book ends as it began, in bloodshed and pain, with Isla being an idiot and declaring that she loves both Oro and Grim, and then she teleports away from the battlefield with Grim because, she declares, as all good melodramatic teenagers would, "We're both monsters!" and she feels the king is too good for her, that she only deserves the love of the implacable, emotionless and cruel king of the Nightshades, Grim. So I was left thinking, "All that crap for this ending?" NOT worth it. I'd give this second book a C+ and only recommend it to those who liked Lightlark so much they can't wait to see more of Isla's denegration and submission to "the dark side of the force."
 
Mortal Arts by Anna Lee Huber is a historical mystery/romance series that I've read about 5 books of, and while they're always interesting, the author could use an editor to trim out the overly long descriptions of 19th century attire, food and social politics, which become tedious fast. Here's the blurb: 
From the national bestselling author of The Anatonmist's Wife comes the second historical mystery featuring enigmatic sleuth Lady Kiera Darby.

Scotland, 1830. Lady Kiera Darby is no stranger to intrigue—in fact, it seems to follow wherever she goes. After her foray into murder investigation, Kiera must journey to Edinburgh with her family so that her pregnant sister can be close to proper medical care. But the city is full of many things Kiera isn’t quite ready to face: the society ladies keen on judging her, her fellow investigator—and romantic entanglement—Sebastian Gage, and ultimately, another deadly mystery.

Kiera’s old friend Michael Dalmay is about to be married, but the arrival of his older brother—and Kiera’s childhood art tutor—William, has thrown everything into chaos. For ten years Will has been missing, committed to an insane asylum by his own father. Kiera is sympathetic to her mentor’s plight, especially when rumors swirl about a local girl gone missing. Now Kiera must once again employ her knowledge of the macabre and join forces with Gage in order to prove the innocence of a beloved family friend—and save the marriage of another.
 
Having read farther along in the series, I know that Gage and Kiera marry and have a child, but it was still exciting to see the genesis of their relationship in this early book of the series. I also liked that this novel dealt with PTSD of the time, and the horrible conditions and treatment of mental illness in asylums, which were little more than prisons run by ghoulish doctors who experimented on and tortured their patients every day for years, until they were mad or died. Huber's prose is overwritten but her plots move along at a stately pace. I'd give this second book in the series a B+ and recommend it to anyone interested in women of the early 19th century.



 

No comments: